Which strategy is identified as most beneficial for measuring individual students' fluency development?

Assigning scores for accuracy and expression is considered the most beneficial strategy for measuring individual students' fluency development because it directly assesses key components that contribute to fluency. Accuracy relates to a student's ability to read words correctly, while expression pertains to the intonation and emotion used when reading aloud. Together, these elements give a comprehensive understanding of a student's fluency skills.

Measuring fluency through accuracy and expression helps educators identify specific areas where students may excel or struggle, allowing for targeted interventions and tailored instruction. This method emphasizes the importance of both the mechanics of reading—such as decoding and word recognition—as well as the performance aspects of reading aloud, which can enhance overall engagement and understanding of texts.

In contrast, relying solely on standardized tests may not capture the nuances of a student's individual fluency development, as these assessments often focus on broader skills and may not provide detailed feedback on expressive reading. Focusing only on comprehension skills neglects the critical aspects of fluency that enable students to understand and engage with texts effectively. While encouraging peer reviews can be beneficial for providing feedback, it is not a primary method for measuring fluency development in a structured way. Thus, the method of assigning scores for accuracy and expression stands out as the most effective strategy for assessing